Alien Baby Corpse: Real, Hoax, Or First Casualty In The Oncoming Galactic War?
September 4th, 2009 1:02 pm by Jonathan
Okay, we've been promising since the inception of Less Than Credulous that we were going to write articles that fell into the realm of the paranormal. So, (with a little help from our neighbors to the south) rather than review an off-center movie, give you a definitive list of video games that changed the industry, or discuss the mortally depressed bovines of Switzerland, I present to you this:
The story has it that in 2007, a Mexican farmer saw two of these creatures and drowned one out of fear (the other fled the scene). Now research has revealed that the corpse contains both human and reptilian characteristics, and a large brain (which points towards intelligence).
Mexico (particularly this area of the country) has a great number of reported UFO sightings and crop circles. Award-winning Mexican UFO researcher Jaime Maussan was the first to break the story.
Now, I am enthralled by tales of encounters with creatures, aliens, and the unexplained; but this article begs some questions that go beyond whether or not this is a hoax:
This is Mexico, for crying out loud! Why are we approaching this as the corpse of an alien, and not a chupacabra?
This one seems pretty easy to me. Chupacabra was sensational in the mid-1990s. Over time, sightings and evidence have been debunked to the point where it has become a B-list cryptid. It won't achieve the status of a Bigfoot, Jersey Devil, Loch Ness Monster, or even Champy. However, when one says this thing is an alien, groups and societies worldwide might actually pause and take interest.
Look at the size of that thing! That flew across space and time to play with a well pump?
I'm not saying that this little guy's sole purpose was to check out farm equipment. It could be part of a naturally curious species. It may not even have traveled through the cosmos, but rather interdimensionally, or from some subterranean dwelling. However, it could also have been some varmint infestation that the farmer was eliminating when he realized that the dead thing (when devoid of hair) looks pretty damn strange (Montauk Monster, I'm looking at you).
It has characteristics of both human and reptilian nature? How is that possible?
Now, before everyone gets in a panic that this might be a descendant of the Rothschild family on behalf of The Illuminati, exercising their will over humanity (or whatever the hell else David Icke believes), let's approach this with a critical (but open) mind:
-
The teeth do not have roots. I cannot explain this one. I do not know enough about biology across different species to give any sort of answer (though I certainly welcome advice) other than saying that since its death, perhaps the roots decayed and no longer exist. Who knows, maybe this guy killed a baby sleestak.
-
It can stay underwater for long periods of time. Evidently not long enough to outlast a Mexican farmer bent on starting an intergalactic war. But seriously, the farmer did say he had to hold the thing underwater for hours before it stopped moving (died). The issues I have with this are a) given its size, I can think of methods that would probably be quicker and more efficient to terminate the life of this creature – provided it wasn't some sort of space-Rasputin (perhaps to be covered in a later article), and b) I'm not seeing any sign of a struggle or any damage to the body in any of these photos or x-rays shots. Maybe it was a gentle drowning, or the creature was biding its time in hopes that the farmer would tire of trying to drown it in a ditch. (But seriously, who ever tires of that kind of fun?)
I'm not saying that researching this is a waste of resources. I'm not even saying that hands-down this is not an alien, but a more earthly creature. I'm not entirely joking in this proposition, but why not include the possibility of goblins, gremlins, and other “fey beings” into the line-up? Does it not fit those descriptions, as well?
I really haven't been around that long, but in my lifetime I've seen people come forth confessing how they faked famous photos of Nessie, a preserved dragon in a jar, alien babies (I know my harlequin kids), and (most recently) an authentic Bigfoot displayed for all the world to see. Not a one of them was what it was supposed to be. However, I am not averse to sound proof to the contrary. I encourage everyone to post their comments, questions, and any evidence they have regarding this, and other anomalies in this reality.
To quote The Bard (or one of them), “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”
